宁夏银川：聚力“三新”产业 激活发展新动能******
中新网银川1月12日电 (记者 李佩珊)产业是发展的基石。2022年以来，宁夏银川市聚焦“六新六特六优”产业，立足本地产业发展优势，突出发展新材料、新能源、新食品“三新”产业，配套发展生物医药、电子信息、装备制造等产业，加快构建高端化、绿色化、智能化、融合化的现代产业体系。2022年，银川市“三新”产业预计完成产值650亿元，同比增长43%左右，增长态势强劲。
隆冬时节，记者走进位于银川经济技术开发区的天通公司晶体加工车间，生产设备忙碌运转，工人们正在对蓝宝石晶体进行掏棒、切断、磨削、开方……依托“世界最大的单晶硅棒生产基地”这一优势，该公司做全光伏发电产业链条，形成光伏产业聚集效应，把银川打造成世界最大的单晶硅切片及光伏组件基地。
银川机器人产品生产线。 银川市工信局供图“在新材料产业，银川市聚焦光伏硅、蓝宝石、第三代半导体、储能电池材料等领域，正在形成从单晶硅到光伏电池、从蓝宝石到智能终端应用、从半导体材料到关键部件、从正极材料到电池材料的全产业链发展格局。”银川市工信局相关负责人表示，在光伏材料领域，银川市已拥有单晶硅棒110GW、硅片45GW、电池15GW的产能，形成了拉晶、切片、电池产业链、坩埚、串焊机配套能力，建成了全国最具影响力的光伏材料制造基地。在半导体材料领域，银川市拥有8寸至12寸大尺寸晶圆、半导体级石英坩埚、硅部件等特色产品，成为国内外芯片供应链上重要的配套产业。在工业蓝宝石领域，银川市形成5500吨蓝宝石晶体、2160万片蓝宝石晶片生产能力，建成了全国最大的工业蓝宝石生产基地。同时，在电池材料领域，银川市的汉尧石墨烯率先成为全球唯一实现富锂锰基材料产业化的企业。
“为发展新能源产业，银川市聚焦风电、光伏发电等领域，重点引进京能、银星能源、威马电机等国内龙头企业，正在形成从光伏产品到光伏发电、从风机塔筒制造到风电设备集成组装、从电池正负极材料到储能动力电池全产业链的发展格局。”银川市工信局相关负责人说。
同时，在新食品产业，银川市聚焦葡萄酒、高端奶产业和枸杞精深加工等领域，中粮长城葡萄酒、蒙牛、百瑞源等重点企业实现高端化、产业化、融合化发展，精深加工食品比重逐渐上升，形成新食品产业新业态。
2022年，银川市共实施66个“三新”产业项目，开工率达97%，完成年度计划投资的34%，占银川市市级工业完成投资的75%。同时，银川市还鼓励企业增加研发投入，培育建设重点实验室、企业技术中心等创新平台，加快推动以企业为主体，“产学研用”相融合的工业创新体系。
银川机器人产品生产线。 银川市工信局供图如今，项目成片、产业成链、企业成串、服务成线。冬季里的银川，勇立产业建设潮头，大干快干热度不减，正不断强化“三新”产业培育，推动区域转型升级，打造支柱产业新优势。集聚新兴产业新动能，银川市发展势头强劲。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
